Thursday, 28 February 2019

Now and then...

I have been thinking a lot about dialogue during February, and not just because of Brexit. To me the constant barrage of abuse and dogmatic belief from both sides regarding the UK's potential exit from the European Union, has highlighted the importance of continued listening and constructive debate between two sides with opposing views. I have also been thinking more about this with my running. 

I tend to find February a tough month to adjust to in my marathon training; it's when the intensity of my speed and tempo session goes up a level, whilst the mileage increases as well. The combination usually leads to me becoming fatigued- whilst I adjust to my training getting harder- and being susceptible to man-flu. It was whilst I had my head covered with a towel over a boiling bowl of Vicks enhanced water, suffering with the aforementioned man-flu, that I listened to Joe Rogan's podcast with Lance Armstrong. I had heard about this episode through the Marathon Talk podcast and it intrigued me. First of all because a lot of the running podcasts tend to focus on the positives of the sport they talk about, and secondly because I haven't really listened to a podcast interview yet where there is a disagreement between the two people talking. The interview with Lance did both of those things: it was about someone who had done something seriously wrong within an endurance sport and Joe wanted to understand why he had cheated, whilst not entirely agreeing with the reasons for why Lance did it. I thought it was a fairly balanced interview, though at some points I thought Joe was being too sympathetic to Lance's stance.I did come away, however, from the interview with a better grasp of how the cheating had occurred and what I genuinely think is a more nuanced view of the systemic problems that cycling/ running faces. An even better example is the Western States 100 Synchroblog Project. I think it is something that should be done more often in running and would allow for a more constructive debate, rather than people getting angry across social media or when an incident happens at a race.